Legal Opinion

Hobday v. Galardi

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 22, 2004No. A04A0027PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

David Hobday was injured when an unidentified object struck his eye at a shooting range on Jack Galardi’s ranch. Hobday sued Galardi, alleging that he had negligently failed to maintain his property in a safe condition. The trial court awarded summary judgment to Galardi on the ground that Hobday had failed to show that his injuries were actually or proximately caused by Galardi’s alleged negligence. We agree and affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We review a trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shadburn v. WhitlowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Pennington v. WJL, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Head v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Christopher v. Donna's Country StoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Nelson v. Polk County Historical Society, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Layfield v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. Gilbert v. City of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Layfield v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Smith v. Liberty Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Todd Riggs v. Highland Hills Apartments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API