Legal Opinion

Head v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1998No. A98A0153PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Inez Head sued Sears Roebuck & Company and a “John Doe” Sears employee (collectively “Sears”) for injuries she allegedly sustained when she fell in one of Sears’ retail stores. Inez’s husband, Albert Head, also sued Sears for loss of consortium. The trial court granted summary judgment to Sears, and the Heads appealed. For reasons which follow, we affirm.

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Nelson v. Polk County Historical Society, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Shadburn v. WhitlowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Avery v. Cleveland Avenue Motel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Christopher v. Donna's Country StoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Jackson v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Lee v. Food LionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API