Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramos-Arenas

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 23, 2010No. 09-2165PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant David Ramos-Arenas was convicted by a jury of falsely impersonating an officer or employee of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 912. He received a sentence of the lesser of six months’ imprisonment or time served with no term of supervised release. 1 R. 68-69. On appeal, Mr. Ramos challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.

Background

Mr. Ramos’s conviction was based on his conduct during a February 24, 2008 traffic stop in southern New Mexico. 1 R. 9;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. KimlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. GoodeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Bolin v. HuffnagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1828
  4. Corporation for the Relief of Poor Distressed Presbyterian v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1831
  5. United States v. Castoreno-JaimeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Daron Lee JungersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. HaymondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. State v. RufusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. United States v. Yurek (Wendy)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API