Culotta v. Sodexo Remote Sites Partnership
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
LANCE M. AFRICK, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion1 to dismiss *469filed by defendant, Sodexo Remote Sites Partnership (“Sodexo”). Plaintiff, Deborah G. Culotta (“Culotta”), opposes the motion.2 For the assigned reasons, Sodexo’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of the same set of facts giving rise to an employment discrimination action Culotta previously filed against Sodexo in Deborah G. Culotta v. Sodexo Remote Sites Partnership, et al. (“Culotta P), Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-2946. Culotta began her employment with Sodexo in…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cuvillier v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Panagiota Heath v. Southern University System FdnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Franklin v. City of SlidellDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Laferty v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2016
- Panagiota Heath v. Southern University System FdnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017