Legal Opinion

United States v. Danny Lee Kyllo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1999No. 96-30333PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge HAWKINS; Dissent by Judge NOONAN.

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:

As a matter of first impression in this circuit, Danny Lee Kyllo (“Kyllo”) challenges the warrantless use of a thermal imaging device as a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Kyllo also challenges reli-anee on a portion of an affidavit discussing his marriage to Luanne Kyllo (“Luanne”), but omitting mention of his divorce, arguing it should not have been considered in determining whether there was probable cause to issue a warrant to search his home. We affirm, holding that the thermal image scan performed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. James Elkins Carol Elkins, United States of America v. Carol Elkins James ElkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Quentin Hinton, AKA Ronnie BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. State v. NorrisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. United States v. Jackson C. O'dell, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API