Legal Opinion

In re Newman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*204OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent, admitted to the practice of law in New York in the Second Department on February 2, 1972, at all relevant times herein maintained an office for the practice of law in the First Department.

In 1978, respondent was suspended for a period of two years by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department (Matter of Newman, 64 AD2d 145), as the result of certain activities from 1976 to 1977, in which he gave false reports to his clients in a litigated matter, drafted a spurious judicial decision, mailed a copy to his clients, and prepared and signed a Judge’s order and…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re WinstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. In re HalperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re BailyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. In re NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. In re KleimanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PerriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re GoffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API