Legal Opinion

Lex Associates v. State

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 5, 1978No. File CV 19-7808-00867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFrancis X. Hennessy, J.

Under the authority of § 47a-23 of the General Statutes, which concerns summary process, the plaintiff in this case seeks to have the defendant removed from leased premises for failure to pay rent. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the summary process action, claiming that the defendant is, in fact, the state of Connecticut and has governmental immunity from suit. There are further claims made by the defendant. The threshold claim of immunity from suit is, however, of primary importance so the court will address itself to that claim only.

The plaintiff is the owner of certain land…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Textron, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  3. State v. KilburnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  4. Somers v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  5. Donnelly v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Lex AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API