Legal Opinion

Ahmad v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 12, 2016No. 1 CA-CV 14-0664PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge:

¶ 1 Shuja Sayed Ahmad and Margaret S. Ahmad appeal from the trial court’s order of remittitur or conditional new trial on damages only, which reduced a jury’s damage award arising from the wrongful death of their son. A.R.S. § 12-613 provides that in wrongful death cases, “the jury shall give such damages as it deems fair and just.” We hold that this broad provision requires utmost deference to the jury’s sense of fairness, and remittitur in such cases must be based upon specific findings demonstrating that no reasonable jury could have reached the verdict based on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Coleman v. SouthwickNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  3. Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. Young Candy & Tobacco Company v. MontoyaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Mammo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michael Soto v. Anthony M SaccoArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Ahmad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API