Vordenbaum v. Rubin
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GUITTARD, Chief Justice.
In this suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of a residence, the trial court, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment for the buyers requiring the sellers to convey the property in accordance with the contract. The sellers appeal on the ground that approval of a note holder was required but was not obtained and also on the ground that another note which the contract obligated the buyers to sign would have been usurious. We hold that the sellers have no standing to raise the question of lack of approval by the note holder or to avoid the contract…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wall v. East Texas Teachers Credit UnionTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Graham & Locke Investments, Inc. v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Community Savings and Loan Association v. FisherTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Maestro Music, Inc. v. Rudolph Wurlitzer CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Mercury Life & Health Company v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re PerryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- James E. Newton and James E. Newton, Inc. v. Billy G. Newman and Automatic Cooling, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992