Legal Opinion
Spradling v. Supervisor of Liquor Control
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided February 25, 1992No. 74151PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKMAR, Judge.
Kenneth and Wanda Spradling, in June of 1989, filed an application by partnership for a retail license to sell 3.2% beer. A question on the application reads:
Has any member of the partnership or any person with a direct or indirect interest in the business ever been charged with, indicted for, or convicted of a violation of any Federal law, law of the State of Missouri, or of any other state, or country? If so, give details:
The Spradlings answered “No.” Wanda testified that she filled out the application and that Kenneth signed it without reading it.
On June 14, 1989, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. CrispSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hermel, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Kansas City v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corporation v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Beer Nuts, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- KV Pharmaceutical Co. v. Missouri State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- Hensley v. Missouri Division of Child Support EnforcementMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995