Poole v. American Bank & Trust Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FORET, Judge.
A number of related actions brought to recover damages for wrongful seizure were consolidated for purposes of this appeal.1 These actions will be referred to throughout *1366the remainder of this opinion by their trial court docket numbers. This Court will render separate judgments in each of these cases for the reasons expressed in this opinion.
Defendants filed various exceptions in each of these actions. The trial court, after trial, rendered judgment sustaining defendants’ peremptory exceptions of prescription filed in actions # 73,782-1, 73,784-2, 73,-785-1, and 73,786-2,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hernandez v. HarsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- Soniat v. WhitmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Burglass v. VillereSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Amer. Bank & Tr. Co. v. Marbane Investments, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Edwards v. TurnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Musso v. AiavolasitiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Poole v. WootenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Childress, Smith & Holloman v. MayeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Marbane Stables, Inc. v. American Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Marvin Poole & Associates of Texas, Inc. v. American Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982