Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Dirks

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1943No. 35,734PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

The principal question presented is whether a certain instrument designated “Sale of Oil and Gas Royalty” constitutes a mineral deed or a conveyance of royalty interest. If it is a mineral deed, carving out of the fee a present subsurface estate in the oil and gas in place, the instrument is void under section 79-420, G. S. 1935, not having been recorded within ninety days after execution or listed for taxation. On the other hand, if the instrument conveyed only a royalty interest—a right to share in oil or gas produced—then the statute is not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kansas Natural Gas Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Robinson v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Richards v. ShearerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Rathbun v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Davis v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cosgrove v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  2. Rist v. Toole CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Lathrop v. EyestoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Shepard v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Desbien v. Penokee Farmers Union Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API