Hickey v. Dirks
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoch, J.:
The principal question presented is whether a certain instrument designated “Sale of Oil and Gas Royalty” constitutes a mineral deed or a conveyance of royalty interest. If it is a mineral deed, carving out of the fee a present subsurface estate in the oil and gas in place, the instrument is void under section 79-420, G. S. 1935, not having been recorded within ninety days after execution or listed for taxation. On the other hand, if the instrument conveyed only a royalty interest—a right to share in oil or gas produced—then the statute is not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kansas Natural Gas Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Robinson v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Richards v. ShearerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Rathbun v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Davis v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cosgrove v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- Rist v. Toole CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1945
- Lathrop v. EyestoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Shepard v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Desbien v. Penokee Farmers Union Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.