State Ex Rel. Horvitz Co. v. Sours

By the Court.

Counsel for relator contends that, since Sections 1206-2,1206-4 and 1206-6, General Code, refer to “the director,” there is a clear expression contemplating that an application will receive the consideration of the director, that the discretion to be exercised will be that of the director himself and that the mere fact that ministerial duties may be delegated by the director does not imply that he may likewise delegate the exercise of his discretion.

Section 1206-6, General Code, cited by relator, pror vides that an applicant “aggrieved by the decision of the director” may request…