Julius Aaron & Son v. Keyser
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING.
REYNOLDS, J.
In an able brief filed in
support of her application for rehearing, counsel for Mrs. Josephine Keyser earnestly contend that our original decision herein is erroneous in holding her liable under Act 262 of 1916, and that Act 229 .of that year is the sole measure of her liability.
*656They confidently urge ■ that the question was determined favorably, to their contention in the cases of—
Rose vs. Eunice Theatre Co., 154 La. 97, 97 South. 322; McKinney vs. Eunice Theatre Co., 154 La. 94, 97 South. 327.
McNaspy vs. Eunice Theatre Co., 154 La. 96, 97 South. 327.
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Louisiana Glass & Mirror Works, Ltd. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Rose v. Eunice Electric Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Musey v. PraterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- McNaspy v. Eunice Electric Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- McKinney v. Eunice Electric Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923