Rose v. Eunice Electric Theatre Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.
The Eunice Electric Theatre Company desired to construct a brick building, on two lots owned by it, in the town of Eunice, the building, when constructed, to be used for theatrical and mercantile purposes. The company did not let a contract for its construction as a whole, but undertook to do the work, without such a contract, through a firm of architects and a foreman and purchasing agent employed by it. The architects were not only to prepare the plans and specifications, but were employed also to advise in the letting of contracts for labor and material, and to render certain general…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gleissner v. HughesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. C. F. Knoll Planting & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Musey v. PraterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
3Cited by14 opinions
- J. J. Clarke Co. v. PetivanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Lawrence v. WrightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Dixie Bldg. Material Co. v. ChartierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- McNaspy v. Eunice Electric Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Monroe Hardware Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.