State v. Booth, C-070184 (3-21-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
{¶ 1} In one assignment of error, defendant-appellant Timothy Lee Booth appeals the judgment of the trial court convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. His sole argument is that the trial court erred when it denied his suppression motion concerning the results of the breathalyzer test administered in this case. For the reasons set forth below, the contention lacks merit.
Citizen Calls Result in OVI Arrest
{¶ 2} Several citizens called law enforcement officials regarding an allegedly drunk driver. Deputy Michael Bingham of the Hamilton County Sheriffs Department…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SteeleOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Wester v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. SiegelOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. Raleigh, 2007-Ca-31 (10-15-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AldridgeOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Kraus, C-070428 (8-8-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. ClementeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. LambertOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. HarringtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.