Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Finger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1986No. 8624SC178Published

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Plaintiff appellants make only two contentions, the first being that the trial judge erred in permitting the defendant to testify over their objections as to certain conversations that she had with plaintiff Artie Lee Peterson before the contested deed was executed. The objections were based on Rule 601(c), N.C. Evidence Code, which recodified the so-called “Dead Man’s Statute,” G.S. 8-51, and the fact that defendant’s claim is adverse to that of the plaintiff Artie Lee Peterson, an adjudged lunatic. The testimony objected to was to the effect that on several different…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitley v. ReddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Bissett v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Matter of Will of RicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. In re the Will of CromartieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API