Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Morris

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 19, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, C. J.

Appellant prosecutes this appeal to reverse in part a foreclosure decree for real estate, declaring another mortgage on it a prior lien.

The record.shows that -C. M. Flynn and Nath Morris were engaged in the mercantile 'business as partners, which partnership was terminated by the death of Nath Morris July 15, 1919. The interest of decedent in the partnership was inherited by his four children. According to the testimony of C. M. Flynn, he and the heirs of Nath Morris, deceased, entered into a written contract under which they were to give mortgages to each other to secure any indebtedness the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cairo & Fulton Railroad v. ParksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
  2. Louisville Silo & Tank Co. v. ThweattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Evans v. HoytSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Hill v. DraperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  5. Williams v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Courtney v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF E. ARK.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Hunter v. ConnellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Hitt v. LyleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  5. Hedlund v. HendrixCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API