Legal Opinion

Hedlund v. Hendrix

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 30, 1992No. CA 92-106PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

George K. Cracraft, Chief Judge.

Walter and Leone Hedlund appeal from an order dismissing their complaint, contending that the trial court erred in finding that their cause of action showed on its face that it was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.

On August 2,1991, appellants filed their complaint alleging that on February 7, 1985, appellee Charles O. Hendrix guaranteed payment of a promissory note payable to appellants in the amount of $143,500.00. Appellants alleged that they subsequently released appellee from his guaranty in consideration of Martha J. Vest and Jerry C. Husley…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. McCartySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Courtney v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF E. ARK.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Broadhead v. McEntireCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Hunter v. ConnellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. Smith v. Olin Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schwarz v. Colonial Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API