Patchen v. Delohery Hat Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover for work and labor and materials furnished, brought to and tried by the City Court of Dan-bury, Booth, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs for $430, and appeal by the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtPrentice, J.
The plaintiffs brought their'action upon the common counts to recover for work and labor done and materials furnished, as set out in their bill of particulars. The defendant pleaded a general denial, a special defense, and a tender. The special defense alleged that the defendant, acting through its president, entered into a contract with the plaintiffs for the performance of the work in the execution of which the labor and materials covered by the bill of particulars were performed and furnished; that in this contract the sum to be paid therefor was agreed upon, and that this sum was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Church v. PearneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Connecticut Hospital for the Insane v. Town of BrookfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Gulliver v. FowlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Hatch v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Talcott v. MeigsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rochon v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Hoard v. Sears Roebuck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Point O'Woods Association, Inc. v. BusherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Douglass v. BrandtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Fish v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.