Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Marks
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided November 27, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The principal question presented for decision is whether the decedent at the time of his death was domiciled in the State of New York or in the State of Florida. Upon the stipulation of the parties the question is to be determined upon the evidence, quite detailed in nature, that was submitted before the appraiser.
Upon that evidence, I hold that the decedent died domiciled in the State of New York.
Arthur Hudson Marks, the decedent, was born in Lynn, Mass. Later he moved to Boston and subsequently to Akron, Ohio, where he became prominently identified with the rubber industry. During…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- In Re Revocation of Ancillary Letters Testamentary of the Estate of NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of HernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- In re the Appraisal of the Estate of LydigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Estate of EisenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941