Legal Opinion

Southern Kraft Corp. v. Hardin, Comm. of Revenues

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 15, 1943No. 4-6988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, C/ J.

Appellants are large users of natural gas and electricity. The question is whether they may enjoin collection of the State two percent sales tax. It is contended the transactions are interstate commerce.

Most of the elements of controversy were present in the appeal prosecuted by Department of Public Utilities in 1937. It was then held that Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company should, include in its reports to the UtilitiesCommission a schedule of rates- charged those who purchased gas at what was termed wholesale, under contracts signed in Louisiana. Customers wlio, it was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. West Wisconsin R. Co. v. Board of Supervisors of Trempealeau Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. BrodieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. McGoldrick v. Felt & Tarrant Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Wiseman v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Wiseman v. Madison Cadillac CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas v. Hardin, Comm. of Rev.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  2. Gay v. United Gas Pipe Line Company.Supreme Court of Florida · 1947
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API