Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 17, 2020No. 18-2358-cr (L)Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-2358-cr (L) United States v. Johnson UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. United States v. CaveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. Stokeling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. United States v. Miguel Bautista and Tony Rodriguez Perez, Luis R. Minier-ContrerasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API