Legal Opinion

Smith v. Buck

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1928No. 20867PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The sole question in this case is whether a slander is a “personal injury” by a “wrongful act,” within the intent and meaning of the proviso to Section 11819, General Code, “an attachment shall not be granted on the ground that the defendant is a foreign corporation or not a resident of this state, for any claim other than a debt or demand, arising upon contract, judgment or decree, or for causing damage to property or death or personal injury by negligent or wrongful act.” 109 Ohio Laws, 59. The trial court in this case held that it is not. The Court of Appeals on error held that it is.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Bradstreet Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Thompson v. JudyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  3. Sanderson v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Addison v. SujetteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  5. Times-Democrat Pub. Co. v. MozeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kraut v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Northwestern Yeast Co. v. BroutinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. Wayt v. DHSC, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Nadra v. MbahOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Haines v. Public Finance Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API