Legal Opinion
Morrison v. Galyon Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided January 6, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.
Original complainant, Carl Morrison, who was defendant to the cross-bill, appealed from the decree ábove indicated.
The assignments of error, eight in number, set forth the conditions more fully and are as follows:
“I. The Chancellor erred in dismissing complainant’s bill and declining to grant the relief therein prayed. The Chancellor should have sustained the bill and held that under the law there is only two methods by which a conditional seller can regain property sold under a conditional sale contract, after default in the payment of installment provided for in the contract, namely, (a)…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Davenport v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Willie B. Turner v. Impala MotorsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Hollibush v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Raffa v. Dania BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Marine Midland Bank-Central v. CoteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.