Legal Opinion

State v. Benjamin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1996No. COA95-1278PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The first issue here is whether defendant waived his right to appellate review of the denial of his motion to suppress his inculpatory statement. Defendant made an assignment of error to the denial of the motion to suppress without making a reference to the inculpatory statement, the legal basis of his argument, and making reference to the record; however, he did provide general references to the transcript of the hearing. N.C.R. App. P. 10(c) provides that an assignment of error is sufficient to preserve defendant’s right to appeal if “it directs the attention of the appellate…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. In re A.N.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API