Legal Opinion

State v. Sutton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 2004No. COA03-1351PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendant James Edwin Sutton appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence presented during his jury trial on charges of trafficking in OxyContin, a prescription opiate painkiller. Defendant contends the evidence should have been suppressed because it was obtained following a stop that violated his Fourth Amendment rights and an interrogation that violated his Miranda rights. Because the totality of the circumstances prior to the stop gave rise to a reasonable, articulable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot, we affirm the trial court’s conclusion that the stop…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PulleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. MareadyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. MareadyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API