Meincke v. Falk
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The cause was before this court on a former appeal and is reported in 55 Wis. 427. The facts appearing upon the second trial are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The plaintiff appealed from a judgment in favor of the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtCole, C. J.
The learned circuit court in this case directed a verdict for the defendant, because it appeared from the testimony that the carriage made and tendered for the defendant’s intestate was not just like the Ball carriage, which was the model selected. The plaintiff testified that the order was for a carriage just like the Ball carriage. He *624said there were some differences between the carriage in question and the Ball carriage, which he deemed improvements, though the body, style, size, and general appearance of the two carriages were alike. But the circuit court ruled, in effect, that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Meincke v. FalkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pacific-Wyoming Oil Co. v. Carter Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Harrild v. Spokane School DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Davis & Rankin Bldg. & Manuf'g Co. v. DixU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1894
- Polson Logging Co. v. NeumeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Lamborn v. BlattnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.