Legal Opinion

Mustard v. City of Bluefield

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1947No. 9997PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riley, Judge:

This is a proceeding in mandamus to require the board of directors of the City of Bluefield, a municipal corporation, to meet and act on relator’s application for a building permit. !

The single issue presented by the petition, return and answer, and replication is whether the board of adjustment, provided for in Section 7, Article 5, Chapter 8, Code, and Section 39 of the ordinance based thereon, was au-' thorized to rehear and revoke its action of May 13, 1947, wherein it had granted to relator the right to erect a building to house a “light industry” on two certain lots owned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Zoning Appeals v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. McGarry v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. Clap v. Municipal CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carter v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Wolfe v. ForbesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Harding v. Board of Zoning Appeals of MorgantownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Wilson v. County Court of Barbour CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State Ex Rel. Ammerman v. City of PhilippiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API