Legal Opinion

State v. Reynolds

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1965PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Two issues are presented on this appeal:

First, was appellant denied his right to a speedy trial?

Second, did the trial court err in admitting testimony that materials in possession of a confederate, apprehended with appellant, came from the site of another alleged burglary which had occurred a week earlier ?

Speedy Trial.

Sec. 7, art. I of the Wisconsin constitution and the Sixth amendment of the United States constitution 1 guarantee an *353accused the right to a speedy trial. Each case involving an alleged denial of this right turns on its own facts; 2 the facts in the instant case are these:…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dietz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State Ex Rel. Fredenberg v. ByrneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Kopacka v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. KennedyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. LombardiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. TewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Commodore v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Galloway v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Strait v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API