Legal Opinion

Lewinson v. Hobart Service Trust Co. of Passaic

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 22, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAKE, District Judge.

The issue here arises on a motion to strike out the complaint upon the ground that the cause of action as set forth therein is not cognizable in a federal court of equity.

At the trial, the complainant abandoned all of the allegations in the complaint, except those contained in counts 2, 4, and 5, thus limiting the issues to allegations charging a preferential payment either in violation of a New York statute in the event that the payment was made in that state, or in violation of a New Jersey statute if the pay■ment was made in that state, and in any event, in violation…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State of Penn. v. THE WHEELING &C. BRIDGE CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Buzard v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. New York Guaranty Company v. Memphis Water CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Warmath v. O'DanielCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  5. Off v. HakesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. CollierDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Boss-Linco Lines, Inc. v. Laidlaw Transportation Ltd. (In Re Boss-Linco Lines, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1985
  3. Salomon v. Luzar (In Re Black & Geddes, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Baird v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
  5. Conn v. KohlemannDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1842

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API