Plamondon v. Outcepts Management & Consulting, LLC
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtWolohojian, J.
After a bench trial that included a view, a Superior Court judge concluded that the defendants had failed to show that the area in which their new billboard is “located is not predominantly residential, agricultural or open space or natural area” “when viewed from the principal highway upon *846which the sign is to face.” 711 Code Mass. Regs. § 3.07(3) (2010). The judge, therefore, found in favor of the plaintiffs (who live nearby) and ordered that the billboard not be illuminated at night and that it be removed within ninety days.3 We now affirm.
Background. We summarize the trial judge’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Wheatley v. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Board of Selectmen v. Outdoor Advertising BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Town of Seekonk v. John J. McHale & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Town of Milton v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.