Legal Opinion

Karl Fezer, Vu-Timothy Nguyen, John Holmes, Steven Kay, Stewart Simon Million-Perez and Daniel Escamilia, individually, and as representatives of a class of participants in and beneficiaries of the Lockheed Martin Corporation Salaried Savings Plan, the Lockheed Martin Corporation Performance Sharing Plan for Bargaining Employees, and the Lockheed Martin Corporation Capital Accumulation Plan v. Lockheed Martin Corporation and Lockheed Martin Investment Management Company

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 16, 2026No. 8:25-cv-00908Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND KARL FEZER, VU-TIMOTHY NGUYEN, JOHN HOLMES, STEVEN KAY, STEWART SIMON MILLION-PEREZ and DANIEL ESCAMILLA, individually, and as representatives of a class of participants in and beneficiaries of the Lockheed Martin Corporation Salaried Savings Plan, the Lockheed Martin Corporation Performance Sharing Plan for Bargaining Employees, and the Lockheed Martin Corporation Capital Accumulation Civil Action No. 25-0908-TDC Plan, and derivatively for those Plans, Plaintiffs, V. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and LOCKHEED MARTIN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Charles F. Lambeth, Jr. Michael D. Lea v. The Board of Commissioners of Davidson County, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API