Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Chicago, Memphis & Gulf Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 12, 1914PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Fulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*837Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hannah

Affirming.

Fred H. Hayden was injured in alighting from a passenger train operated by the Chicago, Memphis & Gulf Railroad Company, at a flag station known as Miller’s Spur in Fulton County, and instituted this action in the Fulton Circuit Court against the railroad company to recover damages therefor. Upon a trial, the court at the close of the evidence for the plaintiff, directed a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The railroad track at Miller’s Spur runs approximately east and west. Immediately to the west of the spur or side track a public road…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  2. Hunter v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Eakin's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. Dallas' Admx.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hines v. MayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Straight Creek Fuel Co. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. City of Owensboro v. WinfreyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Guyan Chevrolet Co. v. DillowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Humphrey v. Fort Knox Transit Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API