Legal Opinion

Wesley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 15, 1903No. 2441PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Ho statement of facts which could be considered, because not properly authenticated by the judge’s approval.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSOH, Presiding Judge.

Conviction for theft, the penalty assessed being one year’s confinement in the county jail.

The indictment is questioned by motion in arrest of judgment because it does not sufficiently negative the consent of the owners. It is charged that the ownership was in the firm of McMullen & Marshall, consisting of T. H. McMullen and Hed Marshall. The proof shows there, were two T. H. McMullens,■ and the McMullen mentioned in the indictment under the evidence was “Jr.,” and that by reason of this fact there is a variance; and also that the general allegation that the property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CairoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1948
  2. Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Peters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API