Wesley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Ho statement of facts which could be considered, because not properly authenticated by the judge’s approval.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSOH, Presiding Judge.
Conviction for theft, the penalty assessed being one year’s confinement in the county jail.
The indictment is questioned by motion in arrest of judgment because it does not sufficiently negative the consent of the owners. It is charged that the ownership was in the firm of McMullen & Marshall, consisting of T. H. McMullen and Hed Marshall. The proof shows there, were two T. H. McMullens,■ and the McMullen mentioned in the indictment under the evidence was “Jr.,” and that by reason of this fact there is a variance; and also that the general allegation that the property…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Morse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CairoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1948
- Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Peters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941