Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. One 1976 Ford Truck Van

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County

Decided October 3, 1978No. 2; no. 53-M of 1977PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, J.,

— At the Commonwealth’s request we have agreed to reconsider our May 23, 1978, determination that the absence of due process requirements prior to forfeiture render the forfeiture provisions of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act of April 14, 1972, P.L. 233, sec. 28, 35 P.S. §780-128 (the 1972 *116Act), invalid. Further briefs have been filed and supplementary oral argument has been presented.

Briefly, the factual background is that the Commonwealth petitioned for the seizure and forfeiture of the 1976 Ford truck van alleged to have been involved in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mazurek v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Fell v. ArmourDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1972
  5. State v. MatheasonWashington Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. One 1965 Buick 4 Door Sedan v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API