Legal Opinion

Brown v. Johnston

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-688PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEITELBAUM, District Judge.

In this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Harold E. Brown alleges Charles B. Johnston and Johnston’s attorney, Blair F. Green, conspired with the district attorney to refile forgery charges against Brown knowing that Brown was innocent and knowing that the nolle-prosse of prior forgery charges precluded a successful second prosecution. Before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Because there are disputed factual issues, the motion must be denied.

On defendants’ motion, the following facts are not controverted on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Jerome Singleton v. City of New York, Ronald Salzer and Anthony DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Robert F. Jennings v. Arthur Shuman, Jr., Robert J. Conway, Gustave Naring, and John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Martin Katz and Louana Katz v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Losch v. Borough Of ParkesburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Williams v. FedorDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Bristow v. ClevengerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Ference v. Township of HamiltonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  4. Felker v. ChristineDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Puricelli v. Borough of MorrisvilleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API