Legal Opinion

Coney v. Farmers State Bank

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1970No. 369A52Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

White, J.

The fundamental juridical question before us on this motion is the extent to which courts should tolerate deviation by attorneys from established rules of procedure without penalizing the client for the deviation. Some procedural uniformity must be maintained in every court, else confusion will render adjudication impossible. But to require overly strict adherence to arbitrary rules often is merely to permit judges to close cases without deciding controversies.

Appellate tribunals must, and do, make two basic demands of litigants who seek to correct alleged errors of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fairwood Bluffs Conservancy District v. ImelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Walner v. CapronIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. OestricherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. West v. Indiana InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Morrow, Inc. v. MUNSONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API