Legal Opinion

Beatty v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 3, 1958No. Cong. No. 8-55PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

This case is before the court on Senate Resolution 115, 84th Congress, 1st Session, referring to us plaintiffs’ claims for a .report thereon, giving findings of fact and stating our conclusions on whether or not plaintiffs have legal or equitable *204claims, and tbe amounts, if any, legally or equitably due from the United States.

The United States desired to purchase plaintiifs’ property for the Canyon Ferry Beservoir in Montana, to be created by the erection of a dam on the Missouri Biver. Negotiations were entered into, with the result that plaintiffs voluntarily sold their property to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
  2. Du Puy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  3. Moseley v. Owensboro Municipal Housing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Loesch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Rough Diamond Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Irene E. Mills and Florence E. Mahoney v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API