Legal Opinion

Allard v. Johnson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 2006No. 20060080PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Viola Allard (“Allard”) appeals from a judgment in which the district court did not apply a statutory presumption of insufficient consideration and undue influence by her attorney-in-fact. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] Allard, a 76-year-old blind woman, brought suit against her former caregiver and attorney-in-fact under a durable power of attorney, Karen Johnson (“Johnson”). Johnson allegedly made unauthorized withdrawals from Allard’s bank account, totaling $28,176.75, for which Johnson cannot provide accounting; purchased a new 2004 GMC pickup…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Diocese of Bismarck Trust v. Ramada, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Burlington Northern & Sante Fe Railway Co. v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Estate of Wenzel-Mosset Ex Rel. Gaukler v. NickelsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Roberts v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Matter of Estate of DinnetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alerus Financial, N.A. v. Western State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Estates of Vizenor and Vizenor v. MeslingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Estate of BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API