Allard v. Johnson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Viola Allard (“Allard”) appeals from a judgment in which the district court did not apply a statutory presumption of insufficient consideration and undue influence by her attorney-in-fact. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] Allard, a 76-year-old blind woman, brought suit against her former caregiver and attorney-in-fact under a durable power of attorney, Karen Johnson (“Johnson”). Johnson allegedly made unauthorized withdrawals from Allard’s bank account, totaling $28,176.75, for which Johnson cannot provide accounting; purchased a new 2004 GMC pickup…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Diocese of Bismarck Trust v. Ramada, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Burlington Northern & Sante Fe Railway Co. v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Estate of Wenzel-Mosset Ex Rel. Gaukler v. NickelsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Roberts v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Matter of Estate of DinnetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alerus Financial, N.A. v. Western State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Estates of Vizenor and Vizenor v. MeslingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Estate of BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.