Sarva v. Chakravorty
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover on a mortgage note, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated November 19, 2003, which denied their motion, in effect, to vacate their default in opposing the plaintiffs’ motion, inter alia, to restore the case to the active calendar.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
*690Although the Supreme Court erred in determining that the demand dated October 7, 1999, attached to the compliance conference order, and signed by the court and by the attorneys for both parties, did not constitute a valid 90-day demand (see CPLR…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roussodimou v. ZafiriadisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Santiago v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Vinikour v. Jamaica HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Aguilar v. KnutsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- European American Bank v. AbramoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. SchuhAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Diamond v. VitucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Caprio v. 1025 Manhattan Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Die Matic Products, Inc. v. Flair International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Goldberger v. GoldbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.