Legal Opinion
US for Use and Ben. of Straightline v. Cna Sur.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 27, 2006No. 2:05-CV-1294Published
1Opinion of the Court
411 F.Supp.2d 584 (2006)
UNITED STATES FOR the USE AND BENEFIT OF STRAIGHTLINE CORPORATION, Plaintiff,
v.
CNA SURETY, Defendant.
No. 2:05-CV-1294.
United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
January 27, 2006.
Allan L. Fluke, Richard W. Saxe, Jr., Thorp, Reed & Armstrong, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff.
Kevin P. Lucas, Manion, McDonough & Lucas, Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HARDIMAN, District Judge.
This case involves a contract dispute between a subcontractor and its surety. Plaintiff Straightline Corporation (Straightline) was hired to fabricate and install woodwork and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Expedia, Inc. v. Altex Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
- United States Ex Rel. Caswell Equipment Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
- United States ex rel. Straightline Corp. v. CNA SuretyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006