Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Straightline Corp. v. CNA Surety

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 2006No. 2:05-CV-1294PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HARDIMAN, District Judge.

This case involves a contract dispute between a subcontractor and its surety. Plaintiff Straightline Corporation (Straightline) was hired to fabricate and install woodwork and cabinetry at the federal courthouse annex in Wheeling, West Virginia. Straightline filed a complaint under the Miller Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3133, against Defendant CNA Surety (CNA), alleging non-payment of the total amount due on Straightline’s contract with the prime contractor, Dick Corporation. Defendant CNA filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3), or,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Expedia, Inc. v. Altex Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
  2. United States Ex Rel. Caswell Equipment Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Norshield Corp. v. E.C. ScarboroughDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009
  2. US for Use and Ben. of Straightline v. Cna Sur.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API