Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Compton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1983No. 55,192, 55,233, 55,218, 55,303PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.:

The State of Kansas appeals in these drunken driving cases from orders of the trial courts declaring portions of K.S.A. 8-1001 and 8-1567 unconstitutional. The defendants, Joe N. Compton, Thomas A. Williams, Kelly R. Keenan and Jose Ramirez, were each charged with driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (DUI) in violation of K.S.A. 8-1567. None of the cases has been tried. In Compton and Williams, the State appeals as a matter of right under K.S.A. 22-3602(fo)(l) from orders finding K.S.A. 8-1001(c) and K.S.A. 8-1567(c),…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Dreyer v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. FavelaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. Forman v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Alpha Medical Clinic v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. Batt v. Globe Engineering Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  5. Cox v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API