Legal Opinion
In the Interest of M. M.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 24, 2003No. A03A1174; A03A1175PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
In separate appeals, the mother of M. M., H. W., and A. P. and the father of A. P. challenge the termination of their parental rights. Each contends that there was not clear and convincing evidence of parental misconduct or inability as required for termination under *354OCGA § 15-11-94. Because the evidence was insufficient, we reverse the mother’s case, Case No. A03A1174, and the father’s case, Case No. A03A1175. Their cases are consolidated in this opinion.
On June 2, 1997, the mother and the biological father of A. P. were involved in a physical altercation with each other, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chancey v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- In the Interest of K. J.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- In the Interest of T. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Shover v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- In the Interest of B. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In the Interest of E.N.C., J.A.C., S.A.L., N.A.G. and C.G.L.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
- In the Interest of J. T. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- In the Interest of T. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- In the Interest of M. T. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- In the Interest of A. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.