Legal Opinion
Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 3, 1993No. C3-92-2363PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Northern States Power Company (NSP) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment, arguing that the policies of respondent St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul) provide primary coverage and that St. Paul is therefore responsible for an allocable share of damages. By notice of review, St. Paul contends the district court incorrectly found that the “own property” exclusion does not preclude coverage and that preventative response costs constitute damages. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
In the early 1900’s, NSP operated a coal gas manufacturing…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- American Home Products Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Broadwell Realty Services, Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- PEDERSON'S FRYER FARMS v. TransamericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Towns v. Northern Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Ala. Plating v. US Fidelity and Guar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.