Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Mueller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 2014PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

An award of an attorney’s fee pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237 lies within the sound discretion of the trial court {see *661Carr-Harris v Carr-Harris, 98 AD3d 548, 552 [2012]). In exercising that discretion, the court must consider the financial circumstances of the parties and the circumstances of the case as a whole, including the relative merits of the parties’ positions (see Guzzo v Guzzo, 110 AD3d 765 [2013]; Matter of Baribault v Sauvola, 101 AD3d 865, 866 [2012]; Matter of O’Neil v O’Neil, 193 AD2d 16, 20 [1993]). The court may also take into account whether one party has delayed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Neil v. O'NeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Chesner v. ChesnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Khan v. AhmedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Guzzo v. GuzzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Baribault v. SauvolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gooden v. GoodenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Gooden v. GoodenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. McMahon v. McMahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API