Smalley v. ZONING HEARING BD. OF MIDDLETOWN
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Justice CASTILLE.
In this zoning appeal, we consider questions arising from a local zoning board’s determination that a long-standing home accounting office did not qualify as a valid nonconforming use in a residential zoning district because the homeowner did not memorialize the professional use by securing a use and occupancy permit, a requirement not previously existing. Because we find that the tribunals below erred in depriving appellant of a valid nonconforming use based upon an unsubstantiated, technical requirement, we reverse and remand the matter for issuance of a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Hertzberg v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Hanna v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Silver v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- HUMPHREYS v. Stuart Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lamar Advantage GP Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Pietropaolo v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- DOMIJO, LLC v. McLainCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Hunterstown Ruritan Club v. Straban Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re Appeal of MoyerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.