Legal Opinion
Beijing Choice Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. v. Contec Medical Systems USA, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 14, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00825Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BEIJING CHOICE ELECTRONIC ) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 18 C 825 v. ) ) Judge Sara L. Ellis CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS USA, INC., ) and CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., ) LTD. ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER In this lawsuit, Plaintiff Beijing Choice Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (“Choice”) alleges that Defendants Contec Medical Systems USA, Inc., and Contec Medical Systems Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Contec”) have infringed on Choice’s patents for a fingertip pulse oximeter and methods for updating the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.