Pinkston v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
The plaintiff, J. Murray Pinkston, instituted this action seeking to recover $300,-000 in damages plus interest for the alleged illegal cancellation of a contract between plaintiff’s business entity, known as Mississippi Editors, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, asserting this Court’s lack of jurisdiction over plaintiff’s contract claims. Plaintiff filed a response asserting jurisdiction in this Court based on a general tort theory. Whether plaintiff has brought this suit in contract or in tort, for the reasons discussed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Skelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- W. H. Moseley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cottrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Lucas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Carlyle Gardens Co. v. Delaware State Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Eliel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.