Legal Opinion

Pinkston v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 14, 1984No. 484-83CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

The plaintiff, J. Murray Pinkston, instituted this action seeking to recover $300,-000 in damages plus interest for the alleged illegal cancellation of a contract between plaintiff’s business entity, known as Mississippi Editors, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, asserting this Court’s lack of jurisdiction over plaintiff’s contract claims. Plaintiff filed a response asserting jurisdiction in this Court based on a general tort theory. Whether plaintiff has brought this suit in contract or in tort, for the reasons discussed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  2. Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. Skelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. W. H. Moseley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  2. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. Lucas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  4. Carlyle Gardens Co. v. Delaware State Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
  5. Eliel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API